Lock-In Hoops Fantasy

Model-driven trade values for Sleeper Lock-In fantasy basketball. Player values combine statistical production, position scarcity, player archetypes, and Lock-In upside to help evaluate trades throughout the 2026–27 season.

Top Trade Values — 2026–27 Full Rankings →
# Player Pos Archetype FPTS PTS REB AST STL BLK Value
1
NJ
DEN
C Stat Stuffer 42.6 28.3 12.7 10.1 1.6 0.8
100
2
LD
LAL
PG Stat Stuffer 40.1 33.0 8.5 8.9 1.6 0.5
93
3
VW
SA
C Versatile Big 39.15 26.3 12.2 3.5 1.1 3.5
90
4
GA
MIA
PF/C Stat Stuffer 37.8 32.1 11.4 6.3 1.1 0.8
86
5
JJ
ATL
PF Stat Stuffer 34.45 23.0 10.6 7.9 1.3 0.5
77
6
CC
DET
PG Stat Stuffer 33.1 24.6 5.6 9.8 1.4 0.8
73
7
SG
OKC
PG Stat Stuffer 33.0 31.3 4.9 6.4 1.7 0.9
73
8
DS
SAC
C/PF Rebounder 32.75 18.9 13.6 6.8 0.8 0.5
73
9
JT
BOS
PF/SF Stat Stuffer 32.65 26.7 8.6 5.8 1.1 0.5
72
10
JG
CHI
PG/SG Stat Stuffer 32.65 18.5 9.2 9.6 1.2 0.6
72
11
AD
WSH
C/PF Versatile Big 32.5 22.6 11.4 3.2 1.1 2.1
72
12
JE
PHI
C Stat Stuffer 30.6 27.4 8.2 4.2 0.7 1.2
67
13
KT
NY
C Rebounder 30.45 21.9 11.2 4.4 0.9 0.6
66
14
AE
MIN
SG/SF Balanced 30.35 30.3 5.2 4.0 1.3 0.8
66
15
LB
MIN
PG Stat Stuffer 30.25 23.1 5.4 8.0 1.3 0.3
66
How Values Are Calculated
Component Description Effect
Base Model Player rankings based on projected fantasy points per game (FPTS/G) Normalized player value
Archetype Classification Players categorized as Stat Stuffers, Versatile Bigs, Playmakers, Rebounders, Pure Scorers, and more Player-specific metadata
Roster Consolidation Bonus for the side receiving fewer players and gaining open roster spots Flat bonus per open spot
Value Falloff Player values decrease by roster slot: 100%, 96%, 92%, 88%, 84%, 80%, 76% 72% for additional slots
Below-Floor Discount Players below the minimum value threshold receive a reduced contribution 40% of value
Stud Bonus Additional premium for the top player in a trade, based on the player's stud bonus Top player only
Player Tiers Elite, Superstar, Star, Starter, and Role Player classifications communicate player value tiers Tier-based classification